My
most recent encounter with fine arts was not what I expected. My family and I
took a trip downtown to the Barnes foundation and I found it to be somewhat
disappointing. In my imagination, I pictured the inside of the Barnes to be
wild and crazy with paintings practically on top of each other, with a rustic
look to the rooms as if they were old and falling apart. At least, I expected
the rooms to have a bit more character and look less like a museum. I had heard
that the Barnes was originally located in Dr. Barnes’ house and moved to
Philadelphia. I could not imagine what I saw to be an actual comfortable home
with all the distracting exit signs and labels. It seemed a little too fake to
me. I guess this is how his house was before but it just seemed a bit boring to
me. All the impressionists’ paintings didn’t really excite me either. But I
guess I am not to judge this, because this is what the museum was all about.
But a few pieces really caught my eye and stuck with me. I was
introduced to Chaim Soutine. His work had a spooky, twisted look to it making
his figures look like they came out of a horror film. The way he distorted his
portraits almost mocked the realistic paintings surrounding his. It made me
realize that you don’t need to paint a portrait realistically to excite the
audience. The rough paint strokes he used, added an awesome texture and aided
the distortion of the figures in his pictures. His rough texture contrasted the
smooth Renoirs hanging nearby. I would be a little more interested in the
Barnes if more Soutine works were shown.
-Maggie
No comments:
Post a Comment